Bokeh is the blurry section of your photographs. Pictures with one thing in focus and everything else out of focus can be really beautiful and engaging images. But when you have bad bokeh in a photo, the background becomes distracting and takes the viewer's eyes away from your crisp subject and as a result your pictures just don't pop out the way they should.
So how do you get good bokeh in your pictures? It all depends on how the light gets to your film/sensor.
The number and shape of the blades in your lens effect bokeh. If you had 4 blades in you lens to adjust your aperture, a blurry light in the background of a picture you took would look like a square, not a circle. If you have a 8 or so blades in your lens, that little blurry light starts looking like a circle.
The quality of your glass in your lens also effects your bokeh. Bokeh can really take away from your image when a little blurry light in the background of your image is a little donut instead of a dot or a sphere. If you don't put some effort into making the optics of a lens, your lens will most likely end up creating distracting blurry areas due to bad bokeh.
So how do you find a camera or a lens that has good bokeh? Well unfortunately for those of us in the western world, we're more focused on what's in focus rather than what's out of focus. As a result we don't see reviews that talk about the quality of bokeh very often. Fortunately, high end camera guys care about it, so at least there's some push to make lenses that don't suck in this department. I guess my tip would be to look at bokeh when testing cameras/lens out. Does this camera's blurry look like good blurry to you?
I'm sorry I don't have a better suggestion than that. Does anyone know of any good online places where they compare the bokeh of different lenses?
So how do you get good bokeh in your pictures? It all depends on how the light gets to your film/sensor.
The number and shape of the blades in your lens effect bokeh. If you had 4 blades in you lens to adjust your aperture, a blurry light in the background of a picture you took would look like a square, not a circle. If you have a 8 or so blades in your lens, that little blurry light starts looking like a circle.
The quality of your glass in your lens also effects your bokeh. Bokeh can really take away from your image when a little blurry light in the background of your image is a little donut instead of a dot or a sphere. If you don't put some effort into making the optics of a lens, your lens will most likely end up creating distracting blurry areas due to bad bokeh.
So how do you find a camera or a lens that has good bokeh? Well unfortunately for those of us in the western world, we're more focused on what's in focus rather than what's out of focus. As a result we don't see reviews that talk about the quality of bokeh very often. Fortunately, high end camera guys care about it, so at least there's some push to make lenses that don't suck in this department. I guess my tip would be to look at bokeh when testing cameras/lens out. Does this camera's blurry look like good blurry to you?
I'm sorry I don't have a better suggestion than that. Does anyone know of any good online places where they compare the bokeh of different lenses?
-
Re: What is Bokeh?
Tue, May 3, 2005 - 10:23 AMIf you want to see what different bokeh looks there are out there, take a look at the images in this contest:
www.dpchallenge.com/challeng...sults.php
Some backgrounds are soft and blurry, some have sharp lines to them, and most tell you what camera and lens they used to take the picture with. -
-
Re: What is Bokeh?
Tue, May 3, 2005 - 10:46 AMBokeh is a really complicated subject. If you want to know more here are some good resorces.
http://194.100.88.243/petteri/pont/How_to/ha_Testing_lenses/a_How_to_test_a_lens.html?page=6
www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm
www.luminous-landscape.com/colu...shtml
www.pathcom.com/~vhchan/bokeh.html
spazioinwind.libero.it/gzappi...h-e.htm
www.planetneil.com/faq/bokeh.html
www.imaginarymagnitude.net/blog....html
www.nikonians.org/dcforum/D.../5894.html
-
-
Re: What is Bokeh?
Tue, May 3, 2005 - 11:59 AMIs Bokeh another way of saying "depth of field"? I've never heard this term before. -
-
Re: What is Bokeh?
Tue, May 3, 2005 - 12:48 PMbokeh |b??k?| noun Photography the visual quality of the out-of-focus areas of a photographic image, especially as rendered by a particular lens : a quick, visual survey of the foreground and background bokeh of a variety of lenses. ORIGIN from Japanese. -
-
Re: What is Bokeh?
Tue, May 3, 2005 - 4:39 PMBO-KEH roughly translates to "broken area" in English. You get bokeh by taking pictures with a shallow depth of field. When people are talking about bokeh, they're attempting to put into words the quality of the blurry parts of a photo. A lens with "Good Bokeh" takes more thought in the manufacturing process than a lens with "Bad Bokeh".
Remember, there is a reason that Sigma lens costs only $150 on eBay when the Nikkor version costs $800. -
-
Re: What is Bokeh?
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 4:41 PMWanna know what happens with different bokeh? Check out this website:
www.flarg.com/bokeh.html
-
Re: What is Bokeh?
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 11:55 AM> A lens with "Good Bokeh" takes more thought in the manufacturing process than a lens with "Bad Bokeh".
Good thing you used quotes there. One man's good is another man's bad. Look at the Lomo and other "bad" lens camera fans. -
-
Re: What is Bokeh?
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 2:51 PMWhich is why most lens manufacturers try and aim for "neutral" bokeh. Right down the middle of the road as to satisfy everyone.
My photography teacher in College wouldn't let anyone throw away anything that wasn't theirs. It may look like trash to you, but it could be the perfect peace of art to the person who made it.
Speaking of crazy art cameras. Here are two "crappy quality" cameras that look like they would be super fun to use...
www.polaroid.com/global/detail.jsp
www.polaroid.com/global/detail.jsp -
-
Re: What is Bokeh?
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 1:03 PMPinhole cameras don't qualify as "crappy quality" to me. Very slow, particularly at the edges, but it has that wonderful infinite depth of field. -
-
Re: What is Bokeh?
Tue, July 19, 2005 - 10:20 PMThen you might be interested in Zork.
zoerk.com/pages/products.htm
They make some really interesting things for SLRs including Pinhole Filters.
zoerk.com/pages/g_pinhol.htm
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: What is Bokeh?
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 1:46 PMNikon makes two lenses that actually have built in "Defocus Control" allowing you to adjust for the kind of bokeh you're trying to get.
The AF DC-Nikkor 105mm f/2D
and the AF DC-Nikkor 135mm f/2D
Here's a pretty good article on them:
www.stacken.kth.se/~maxz/defocuscontrol/
(he's been getting so many hits on his website, that sometimes it's hard to get through. I just tried back an hour later and got through just fine) -
-
Re: What is Bokeh?
Tue, July 19, 2005 - 10:43 PMNikon has a $75 rebate on right now for the AF DC-Nikkor 105mm f/2D.
www.nikonusa.com/fileuploa...ebates.pdf -
-
DC-Nikkor 105mm Review
Tue, May 9, 2006 - 11:19 AMSo after owning a DC-Nikkor 105mm for a while now, here's what I think of the thing...
If you're a portrait photographer, you should really own this lens. You know that soft focus look you get from putting panty hose over the lens? Well you can achieve that look over the whole image or just part of the image by cranking the defocus control.
As for the rest of us, it's ok. I still use the lens a lot, but mainly cuz it's so well made, not because of the "DC". It has beautiful optics and cranks all the way open to f/2, but I almost always leave the defocus control at 0. I get really pretty and professional looking photos out of it, but I can't stand up close to my subjects (especially now that I'm using a DSLR) and I never use the feature that I bought it for in the first place. All in all it's just a really nice fixed 105mm lens for me. If you like that sort of thing, get a DC-Nikkor 105mm. If not, spend your money of a really fast zoom or something. The ability to make your blurry parts of your photos look as if they are soft (like putting panty hose over just the background of your image) is interesting, but I think I prefer the look of "bad bokeh" better. I didn't get into photography for the panty hose look, I got into photography for the art of it. My visual eye doesn't really equate the two to be synonymous with one another. -
-
Re: DC-Nikkor 105mm Review
Thu, May 18, 2006 - 1:12 PMDamn you! As if there weren't enough things in this world for me to want.
-
-
-